Early Human Development
Volume 82, Issue 2 , Pages 97-103, February 2006

Retrospective economic evaluation of a controlled trial of indomethacin prophylaxis for patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants

  • John A.F. Zupancic

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Rose Building Room 318, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Tel.: +1 617 667 3276; fax: +1 617 667 7040.
  • ,
  • Douglas K. Richardson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Deceased.
  • ,
  • Bernie J. O'Brien

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Deceased.
  • ,
  • Catherine G. Cronin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • ,
  • Barbara Schmidt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Robin Roberts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Milton C. Weinstein

      Affiliations

    • Center for Risk Analysis, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • ,
  • Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms Investigators

Abstract 

Objective

To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of indomethacin prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants enrolled in the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP).

Study design

Participants in this economic evaluation were 428 infants enrolled at 9 Canadian TIPP centres. The study took a third-party payer perspective. Prior to the analysis of clinical trial data, direct medical costs were derived from chart review of 89 items of resource utilization, for each day from admission to hospital discharge. Unit costs for each resource were obtained from a provincially standardized cost-accounting system. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed, with estimation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves through non-parametric bootstrapping.

Results

The mean (SD) cost was $68279 (40317) for the placebo group and $69629 (37989) for the indomethacin group. Indomethacin prophylaxis cost an additional $67500 per death or impairment averted. However, the precision of this estimate was low, such that the probability that the estimate was lower than $300000 per death or impairment averted was only 61%. The results were similar when surgical costs were assumed to be 500% of those measured in the trial.

Conclusions

This study does not provide an economic rationale for the use of indomethacin prophylaxis in ELBW infants.

Keywords: Economics, Resource utilization, Infant, newborn, Costs and cost analysis, Controlled clinical trials

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-3782(06)00014-4

doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.01.004

Early Human Development
Volume 82, Issue 2 , Pages 97-103, February 2006