Journal Home
Search for

Volume 83, Issue 1, Page 1 (January 2007)


View previous. 3 of 12 View next.

Letter to the editor: “Is hypotension a major risk factor for neurological morbidity at term age in very preterm infants”

W. Engleemail address

Article Outline

References

Copyright

January 12, 2004

Dr. David R. Harvey, Editor-in-Chief

Department of Paediatrics

Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital

Goldhawk Road

London W6 OXG

United Kingdom

Dear Dr. Harvey:

Martens et al. [1] present the title of their recent report in the form of a question: “Is hypotension a major risk factor for neurological morbidity at term age in very preterm infants?” Unfortunately, the design of the study did not allow the authors to answer this important question.

The major limitation is the use of a single mean arterial blood pressure value (<30 mm Hg) to define hypotension. In 2000, we reported blood pressure data in 116 neonates with birth weights ≤1500 g [2]. In these very-low-birth-weight neonates, 95% confidence intervals for mean blood pressure extended well below 30 mm Hg, and for those infants with birth weights ≤1000 g, they extended slightly below 20 mm Hg. When the neonates were separated into gestational age groups, a clear relationship between lower gestational age and lower mean blood pressure was observed during the first 72 h postnatal.

An additional concern regarding the current study [1] is the failure to account for the postnatal rise in mean blood pressure. Although not clearly specified, it appears that all blood pressure measurements obtained during the initial hospitalization were included in the analysis. We [2] and others [3] have shown that blood pressure increases significantly during the first week of life. Analyzing the blood pressure data in light of postnatal age [1] would have clarified further which neonates were truly hypotensive.

In Table 3, Martens et al. [1] report a highly significant (p<0.001) relationship between gestational age <27 weeks and hypotension, and it is noted that 22 of the 30 neonates in this gestational age category (73%) were hypotensive using the study criteria (<30 mm Hg). Although the authors attempted to control for confounding variables, the value for the adjusted lower confidence interval bound for hypotension was 1.02, i.e., just above 1.00 (Table 2). These results suggest that further evaluation of the data [1] using gestational and postnatal age-specific data for mean blood pressure would provide clarification of the relationship between hypotension and outcome in preterm neonates.

Sincerely,

William D. Engle, MD

Charles R. Rosenfeld, MD

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Martens SE, Rijken M, Stoelhorst GM, van Zwieten PH, Zwinderman AH, Wit JM, et al. Is hypotension a major risk factor for neurological morbidity at term age in very preterm infants?. Early Hum Dev. 2003;75:79–89. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (122 KB) | CrossRef

[2]. [2]LeFlore JL, Engle WD, Rosenfeld CR. Determinants of blood pressure in very low birth weight neonates: lack of effect of antenatal steroids. Early Hum Dev. 2000;59:37–50. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (177 KB) | CrossRef

[3]. [3]Zubrow AB, Hulman S, Kushner H, Falkner B. Determinants of blood pressure in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. J Perinatol. 1995;15:470–479. MEDLINE

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9063, United States

PII: S0378-3782(06)00111-3

doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.11.010


View previous. 3 of 12 View next.