Early Human Development
Volume 84, Issue 6 , Pages 381-388, June 2008

Preterm infants' timing strategies to optical collisions

  • Nanna S. Kayed

      Affiliations

    • Developmental Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychology, NTNU, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Tel.: +47 73 55 07 38; fax: +47 73 59 19 20.
  • ,
  • Hanne Farstad

      Affiliations

    • Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, St Olav's University Hospital, 7006 Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Audrey L.H. van der Meer

      Affiliations

    • Developmental Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

Received 16 May 2007; received in revised form 28 August 2007; accepted 7 October 2007.

Abstract 

Background

A virtual object approaching on a collision course will elicit defensive blinking in infants. Previous research has shown that when precisely timing their blinks, full-term infants shift from using a strategy based on visual angle/angular velocity to a strategy based on time between 22 and 30 weeks of age.

Aim

To investigate which timing strategy preterm infants use to determine when to make the defensive blink.

Methods

Eight preterm infants were tested at 26 weeks, corrected for prematurity. For three of these infants, longitudinal data at 22, 26, and 30 weeks were available. The virtual object approached the infants with different constant velocities and constant accelerations.

Results

At 26 weeks, three infants blinked when the virtual object's visual angle reached a threshold value causing them to have problems with fast, accelerating approaches. Four infants blinked when the virtual object was a certain time away, allowing them to blink in time on all approach conditions. One infant stood out because he relied on a timing strategy based on angular velocity on all three test sessions, causing him to blink late on a large number of trials even at 30 weeks.

Conclusion

As good timing is essential for successful interaction with the environment, the inability to switch from a timing strategy that is prone to errors to a strategy that enables successful defensive blinking reflects lack of flexibility to adjust appropriately to local circumstances. This might be an early indication of perceptuo-motor problems that warrants further investigation.

Keywords: Optical collision, Defensive blinking, Preterm infants, Timing, Prospective control

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-3782(07)00200-9

doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.10.006

Early Human Development
Volume 84, Issue 6 , Pages 381-388, June 2008